ads/auto.txt

Outcome Selection Bias In Meta Analysis

Outcome Selection Bias In Meta Analysis. Publication bias has been previously identified as a threat to the validity of a meta-analysis. Study publication bias and outcome reporting bias have been recognised as a potential threat to the validity of meta-analysis and can make the readily available evidence unreliable for decision.

Collider Scope When Selection Bias Can Substantially Influence Observed Associations Biorxiv
Collider Scope When Selection Bias Can Substantially Influence Observed Associations Biorxiv from www.biorxiv.org

It is sometimes referred to as the selection effect. Publication bias has been previously identified as a threat to the validity of a meta-analysis. The withinstudy selective reporting of outcomes defined as the selection of a subset of the original variables recorded for inclusion in publication of trials can theoretically have a substantial impact on the results.

If the selection bias is not taken into acco.

Some articles might report only a selection of those outcomes perhaps those with statistically. Some articles might report only a selection of those outcomes perhaps those with statistically. A potentially bigger threat to the validity of a metaanalysis appears relatively unnoticed. Recently new evidence has documented an additional threat to validity the selective reporting of trial outcomes within published studies.